{"id":1238,"date":"2026-08-06T12:57:30","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T02:57:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/?p=1238"},"modified":"2026-08-06T12:57:31","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T02:57:31","slug":"%e6%be%b3%e6%b4%b2%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af%e7%ad%be%e8%af%81%e5%ae%a1%e7%90%86%e9%a1%ba%e5%ba%8f%e9%87%8d%e6%8e%92%ef%bc%9amd119%e6%ad%a3%e5%bc%8f%e7%94%9f%e6%95%88%ef%bc%8c%e5%a2%83%e5%86%85%e7%94%b3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/%e6%be%b3%e6%b4%b2%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af%e7%ad%be%e8%af%81%e5%ae%a1%e7%90%86%e9%a1%ba%e5%ba%8f%e9%87%8d%e6%8e%92%ef%bc%9amd119%e6%ad%a3%e5%bc%8f%e7%94%9f%e6%95%88%ef%bc%8c%e5%a2%83%e5%86%85%e7%94%b3\/","title":{"rendered":"Reshuffling of Australian Skilled Visa Processing Order: Ministerial Direction 119 Officially Commences, Onshore Applicants Granted Priority, Construction Sector Included in Priority Processing Queue for the First Time"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"translation-block\">Australia\u2019s Department of Home Affairs has rolled out updated processing priorities for skilled migration visas. Ministerial Direction No.119 (MD119) came into full force on 25 July 2026, superseding the previous Ministerial Direction 105. The new directive revises high-priority occupations and restructures processing precedence for onshore versus offshore applicants; all pending applications awaiting final decisions will be re-ranked under the new rules. This policy shift delivers a clear strategic signal: skilled visa processing focus has shifted from the former priority for regional locations and designated employer-sponsored applications to national security &amp; law enforcement talent, onshore skilled workforce, and construction &amp; housing development-related professions. For candidates applying for or planning to lodge visas including Subclass 189, 190, 491, 482, 186 and 494, MD119 will directly determine the queue position of their visa matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">I. Visa Subclasses Governed by MD119<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MD119 covers mainstream skilled migration and employer-sponsored visa subclasses as listed below:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Subclass 186 Employer Nomination Scheme Permanent Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 187 Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 189 Independent Skilled Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 190 State Nominated Skilled Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 191 Permanent Residence (Skilled Regional) Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 482 Skills in Demand Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Legacy Subclass 482 Temporary Skill Shortage Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 489 Regional Skilled Provisional Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 491 State or Family-Nominated Regional Provisional Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 494 Regional Employer-Sponsored Temporary Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 887 Regional Skilled Permanent Residence Visa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Subclass 888 Business Innovation and Investment Permanent Visa<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Priority ranking for employer nomination applications mainly applies to Subclasses 186, 187, 482 and 494. Notably, the new 482 Skills in Demand Visa is formally incorporated into the MD119 priority framework, whereas it was excluded entirely under MD105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">II. Five-Tier Processing Priority Framework Under MD119<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All relevant skilled visa and employer nomination applications will be sequenced in five hierarchical tiers under the new directive:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Priority 1: Onshore Applicants in Law Enforcement &amp; Defence-Related Occupations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Highest priority is assigned to applications satisfying both criteria: primary applicant is physically present in Australia at the time of lodgement; nominated occupation serves Australia\u2019s law enforcement or national defence interests. Eligible roles include designated police occupations, Australian Defence Force postings, and positions linked to AUKUS initiatives.\nImportant clarification: Not all security, legal or engineering roles qualify for this tier. Applications must strictly align with the official definition of law enforcement\/defence occupations and approved nominating bodies outlined in MD119.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Priority 2: Offshore Applicants in Law Enforcement &amp; Defence-Related Occupations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Applications lodged from outside Australia for eligible law enforcement or defence occupations fall under Tier 2. Within the defence and law enforcement occupation pool, onshore applications will always be processed prior to offshore counterparts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Priority 3: Onshore Applicants in Healthcare, Education and Construction Occupations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Tier 3 eligibility requires the primary applicant to be on Australian soil upon application lodgement, with a nominated occupation within healthcare, education or construction sectors. Healthcare and education professions have maintained priority status historically, while the most transformative update is the formal inclusion of the entire construction sector in high-priority processing.\nCovered construction occupations extend beyond traditional trades including carpenters, bricklayers and electricians, and include designated roles such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Construction Managers<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Architects &amp; Landscape Architects<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Civil Engineering Professionals<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Building Surveyors &amp; Associated Technical Specialists<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Building Safety Inspectors<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Structural Steel &amp; Welding Tradespersons<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Crane Operators<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Earthmoving Machinery Operators<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>General Electricians &amp; Specialist Electricians<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Occupation eligibility is verified via official ANZSCO occupational codes rather than generic job titles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Priority 4: All Other Onshore Applicants<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Applicants with non-priority occupations who lodge their visa application while physically in Australia are placed in Tier 4. For example, general IT, accounting, marketing or engineering professionals submitting skilled visa applications onshore will be prioritised ahead of offshore applicants with identical non-priority occupations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Priority 5: All Other Offshore Applicants<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Candidates outside the law enforcement\/defence priority categories and lodging applications from overseas are allocated to Tier 5. This tier does not equate to automatic refusal or indefinite processing suspension; it means Home Affairs will allocate case resources to Tier 1\u20134 applications first before commencing assessment for Tier 5 matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">III. Critical Rule: Eligibility for Onshore\/Offshore Ranking Is Determined by Lodgement Date Location<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">This is the most frequently misinterpreted clause within MD119. The directive references the primary applicant\u2019s physical location on the exact date of visa\/nomination lodgement, not their current location or location at the time of case assessment.\nCase Example 1: An applicant lodges a Subclass 190 visa onshore in Australia, then departs Australia under a bridging visa. The application retains its original onshore priority ranking for the full assessment cycle, provided the application remains valid.\nCase Example 2: An applicant lodges a Subclass 189 visa from China, later enters Australia via another visa. Their application will not be reclassified as an onshore application purely due to subsequent arrival in Australia.\nIn short, post-lodgement travel to Australia cannot retroactively upgrade an offshore application to onshore priority status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">IV. Core Changes Compared to MD105<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Change 1: Formalised Onshore Precedence Over Offshore Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MD119 establishes an explicit rule that all onshore applications outrank offshore equivalents within the same occupational category, a structural overhaul absent in MD105. This reflects the federal government\u2019s policy focus on expediting visas for skilled migrants already residing and working in Australia and contributing to local labour market demands. The preamble of MD119 explicitly confirms that prioritising resident skilled migrants addresses Australia\u2019s immediate skilled labour shortages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Change 2: Construction Industry Added to High-Priority Processing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MD105 focused priority treatment on healthcare, education and select regional employer-sponsored applications. MD119 elevates the entire construction sector to Tier 3 priority, listing comprehensive construction, civil engineering, trade and site operations roles. This adjustment directly responds to acute shortages in Australia\u2019s residential construction, civil infrastructure and construction trades workforce. Official documentation confirms the updated priority focus covers healthcare, education and construction industries centred on residential housing delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Change 3: Law Enforcement &amp; Defence Occupations Promoted to Top-Tier Priority<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roles supporting Australian domestic law enforcement, national defence and AUKUS cooperation are elevated to the apex of the skilled visa processing queue, split into onshore (Tier 1) and offshore (Tier 2) sub-rankings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Change 4: Regional Location No Longer Constitutes Standalone Top-Tier Priority<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">MD105 granted elevated processing priority to regional employer-sponsored Subclass 186, 482 and 494 nominations. Under MD119\u2019s five-tier model, regional placement is no longer an independent criterion for top-tier prioritisation. Case ranking is now determined exclusively by three factors: lodgement location, nominated occupation, and alignment with national defence\/law enforcement interests.\nThis revision does not abolish Australia\u2019s regional migration policy or reduce quota allocations for Subclass 491\/494 regional visas. It only removes regional status as a standalone trigger for expedited processing under the Ministerial Direction framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Change 5: Accredited Sponsors Removed from Separate Priority Classification<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Under the former processing framework, nominations submitted by Accredited Sponsors received expedited assessment. MD119 eliminates a dedicated priority tier for accredited sponsor applications. The accredited sponsor credential remains valid for sponsorship compliance benefits, yet processing speed will now follow the standard MD119 tier structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>V. Impact for Already Lodged Visa Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MD119 applies retroactively to all unresolved applications lodged prior to 25 July 2026, alongside new applications submitted on or after the effective date. Key implications:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Pre-existing pending visa matters will be re-sequenced according to the five-tier priority structure<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Applications with elevated priority under MD105 may drop in queue positioning under the new rules<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Newly eligible onshore construction, healthcare and education applications will move forward in the assessment queue<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>General offshore applicants will face comparatively longer waiting periods for case commencement<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Home Affairs will not require applicants to resubmit visa applications to comply with the new direction. Additionally, applicants cannot demand urgent assessment or guaranteed decision timelines solely on the basis of qualifying for a high-priority tier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>VI. Clarification: Priority Queue Position \u2260 Guaranteed Fast Visa Approval<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Securing high processing priority only accelerates the commencement of case review; it does not alter visa grant eligibility thresholds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>High-priority classification does not entitle applicants to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Guaranteed visa approval within a fixed timeframe<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Automatic visa grant approval<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Exemption from formal skills assessment requirements<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Relaxed age, English proficiency or work experience benchmarks<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Waivers for health and character clearances<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dispensation for incomplete nomination, sponsorship or visa supporting documents<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Eligibility to apply for visa subclasses outside the MD119 approved list\nExtension of the validity period for the current bridging or substantive visa<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Official guidance confirms MD119 does not revise the Skilled Occupation List. All applicants must satisfy every statutory visa requirement under the Migration Act 1958 and Migration Regulations 1994. Even Tier 1 or Tier 3 applications will face delays if documentation is incomplete, medical examinations are outstanding, police clearances have expired, occupational details contain discrepancies, or employer nomination paperwork is deficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>VII. FAQs for General Applicants<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Q1: Will onshore lodgement for 189, 190 or 491 guarantee rapid visa processing?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No. While onshore applications outrank offshore equivalents, general onshore non-priority occupations fall into Tier 4, ranking behind Tier 1 (onshore defence\/law enforcement), Tier 2 (offshore defence\/law enforcement) and Tier 3 (onshore healthcare\/education\/construction). Furthermore, lodgement eligibility for 189\/190\/491 remains conditional on EOI invitations, state nomination and competitive point-test scores, independent of processing priority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong><strong>Q2: Do offshore healthcare, education or construction applicants qualify for Tier 3 priority?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tier 3 is strictly reserved for applicants lodging applications while physically in Australia. Overseas candidates in healthcare, education or construction occupations will default to Tier 5 unless their occupation falls within the defence\/law enforcement priority category. This is a critical policy distinction for offshore trade and medical applicants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong><strong>Q3: How is priority determined for family-unit applications with offshore secondary applicants?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All dependent family members included within the primary applicant\u2019s visa submission inherit the primary applicant\u2019s processing priority. Tier classification is determined solely by the primary applicant\u2019s lodgement location and nominated occupation, irrespective of the residential status of secondary applicants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong><strong>Q4: Can lodging a visa during a tourist stay in Australia unlock onshore processing priority?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Processing priority is only one consideration. Applicants must first verify foundational compliance:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Whether the current substantive visa permits onshore visa lodgement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Presence of No Further Stay conditions (8503 \/ 8534 \/ 8535) prohibiting onshore substantive visa applications<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Eligibility for onshore lodgement under the target visa subclass<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Entitlement to bridging visa coverage post-lodgement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Risk of adverse visa history findings for primary intent misrepresentation (entering Australia on a tourist visa solely to lodge a skilled visa for priority benefits)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>MD119 is not designed to incentivise tourist visa holders to switch visas onshore for faster processing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">Applicants cannot submit discretionary requests to upgrade processing priority for personal expedience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Usually, it is not possible to simply request the immigration authority to expedite the processing just because of personal wishes. Instead, the case must be adjusted to a higher priority level. Whether a case falls under a certain priority category is determined by factors such as the visa type, the place of submission by the main applicant, the occupation code, and relevant nomination facts, rather than being chosen by the applicant themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>VIII. Action Plan for Different Applicant Groups<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For Candidates with Already Lodged Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Conduct a full file review covering:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Primary applicant physical location on the exact date of visa\/nomination lodgement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ANZSCO occupational code listed in the nomination\/visa application<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Alignment with MD119-defined defence\/law enforcement, healthcare, education or construction priority occupations<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Completion status of all uploaded supporting documentation<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Validity of passports, medical examinations and police clearance certificates<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Outstanding request for further information (RFIs) in the ImmiAccount portal<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Elevated processing priority cannot offset incomplete or expired supporting documentation; full application readiness remains the most effective mitigation for unnecessary assessment delays.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For Candidates Preparing to Lodge New Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Avoid structuring migration plans solely around MD119 processing priority. Conduct holistic due diligence covering:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Core eligibility for the target visa subclass<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Feasibility of securing state nomination or employer sponsorship<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Validity and expiry timeline of formal skills assessment outcomes<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>English language test results and age point allocation<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Legality of onshore visa lodgement under current visa conditions<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Current visa expiry date and bridging visa contingency planning<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>State-specific occupation lists and EOI invitation trends<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Favourable queue positioning delivers tangible benefits only when the underlying visa application is valid, complete and fully compliant with visa criteria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For Employer-Sponsored Visa Applicants &amp; Sponsoring Employers<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Joint verification for both parties:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ANZSCO occupational code used for the formal nomination<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compliance of the nominated role with genuine full-time employment obligations and market rate salary requirements<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Primary applicant location at the time of nomination and visa lodgement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Alignment of the nominated role with MD119 priority occupational definitions<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Consistency of information across nomination and visa application documentation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For roles with job titles inconsistent with the ANZSCO code definition, occupational eligibility for construction, healthcare or other priority tiers cannot be confirmed based solely on day-to-day job titles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>IX. Strategic Policy Signals of MD119<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MD119 consolidates Australian skilled visa administrative capacity to focus on three core national priorities:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>National security and strategic capability retention, prioritising law enforcement, defence and AUKUS-linked skilled professionals<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Retention of skilled migrants already residing and contributing economically within Australia<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Direct workforce supplementation for public services and residential housing supply via expedited processing for healthcare, education and construction workers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>General offshore skilled migration applicants will experience longer pre-assessment lead times under the new tier structure. In contrast, onshore applicants and onshore candidates in healthcare, education and construction occupations will benefit from accelerated file commencement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"translation-block\">A fundamental distinction must be maintained:A fundamental distinction must be maintained: processing priority governs the order of case review, while statutory visa criteria determine grant approval. MD119 does not relax visa eligibility thresholds, introduce new migration pathways, or guarantee invitations or visa approvals for priority-listed occupations.MD119 marks a landmark overhaul of Australian skilled visa administrative workflows, effective 25 July 2026. The definitive processing hierarchy is as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Onshore law enforcement &amp; defence applicants (Highest Priority)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Offshore law enforcement &amp; defence applicants<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Onshore healthcare, education &amp; construction applicants<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Remaining onshore general skilled applicants<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Remaining offshore general skilled applicants (Lowest Priority)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Applicants must focus on four core verification items for accurate tier positioning: official alignment of nominated occupation with MD119 definitions, primary applicant location at lodgement, MD119 coverage of the target visa subclass, and full completeness of application supporting materials.\nThis brief is compiled based on MD119 official documentation and skilled visa processing guidance released by the Department of Home Affairs as of 03 August 2026, for general informational reference only, and does not constitute formal migration legal advice tailored to individual circumstances. Policy wording, occupational definitions and processing protocols are subject to future amendment; all formal visa planning should reference the latest official Home Affairs publications and personal factual circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u6fb3\u6d32\u5185\u653f\u90e8\u8fd1\u65e5\u66f4\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u7b7e\u8bc1\u5ba1\u7406\u4f18\u5148\u7ea7\u3002\u81ea 2026\u5e747\u670825\u65e5 \u8d77\uff0c\u65b0\u7684 Ministerial Direct [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1239,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11,10,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-success-stories","category-study-and-immigration-news","category-immigration-consulting"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406.png",1154,1608,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-215x300.png",215,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-768x1070.png",768,1070,true],"large":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-735x1024.png",735,1024,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-1102x1536.png",1102,1536,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406.png",1154,1608,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/\u4f18\u5148\u5ba1\u7406-9x12.png",9,12,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"EBP Immigration Consulting","author_link":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/author\/ebp-immigration-consulting\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"\u6fb3\u6d32\u5185\u653f\u90e8\u8fd1\u65e5\u66f4\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u7b7e\u8bc1\u5ba1\u7406\u4f18\u5148\u7ea7\u3002\u81ea 2026\u5e747\u670825\u65e5 \u8d77\uff0c\u65b0\u7684 Ministerial Direct&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1238"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1240,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238\/revisions\/1240"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebpimmigrationconsultant.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}